Marc Randazza Says "The First Amendment requires neither tact nor politeness". Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite. Marc Randazza is CENSORING my "view". Marc Randazza's Double Standards are Blatant Attacks on Free Speech for ALL.

"The First Amendment requires neither tact nor politeness. It requires that we permit all views to set up stalls in the marketplace of ideas, and we let that marketplace decide which ideas prevail."

Marc Randazza, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza Quote Source
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/12/opinion/randazza-limbaugh-speech/index.html


Marc Randazza talks BIG, however Marc Randazza does not walk the Marc Randazza talk.

Marc Randazza is working to SHUT Down the Voice of Blogger Crystal Cox by Working with Plaintiff's Attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm to STEAL the Domain Names once Registered by Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza is pretending to be Subpoenaed by David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm.

However Marc Randazza really offered himself up to be Deposed AGAINST blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza has done this to punish blogger Crystal Cox, or in Marc Randazza's words make an "enemy" of me.  See Blogger Crystal L. Cox, ME bought Marc Randazza .com, and domain name attorney, all for free speech and First Amendment Rights Allegedly, WELL Marc Randazza got SO Pissed off that he contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox, which is one of the BIGGEST, most Important First Amendment Legal Case ever to hit the Blogsphere... Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's who sued me, and offered to negotiate for me, that was in December. Marc Randazza, then acted as if Marc Randazza represented Blogger Crystal Cox, and yet Marc Randazza did not let me, the potential client know and I had been interviewing other First Amendment Attorneys.

Only to find out from them that Marc Randazza was claiming to represent me and that Marc Randazza had even contacted the Plaintiff's Attorney, David Amen of Tonkon Torp Law Firm BEHIND MY BACK, disclosing my strategy and personal information to the ENEMY. Without my Permission after he spoke with me interviewing to be my Attorney, and me interviewing to be his client.

Marc Randazza said he would get back to me, Marc Randazza did not get back to me until I had to email Marc Randazza and let him know that is was NOT Ok to tell other Attorneys or anyone for that matter that Marc Randazza represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, because Marc Randazza had made no deal with me. Marc Randazza only extracted information and used it against me.

Then I emailed Marc Randazza to tell him why I did not choose him and he wished me luck. Months later I asked Marc Randazza if knew anyone that would be interested in hiring me for PR, as I had been evicted and was penniless and needed a job. Marc Randazza told me he would not hire me, because I was unEthical, See Marc Randazza was really PISSED OFF because I was smart enough to buy Marc Randazza .com and Jackass Marc Randazza was not. So in his rage Marc J. Randazza has sought revenge by STOMPING on the First Amendment Rights of all and interfering further into the Obsidian V. Cox case ( ya Know the One that I CHOSE not TO Let Arrogant, Disrespectful Asshole Marc Randazza Represent me in), Well Marc Randazza got in the middle of it anyway and ON The Wrong side of the Law, WRONG side of those "Ethics" Mr. Hypocrite Marc Randazza is all BIG about and Seriously on the WRONG Side of Bloggers Rights and the First Amendment.

Believe Me Tact and Politeness is the Last thing that Marc Randazza deserves from me or anyone else for that matter. Marc Randazza disrespected me. Marc Randazza is working to Censor Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.

Marc Randazza ran over my rights and Marc Randazza DOES not fight for the First Amendment for All, Marc Randazza fights for the First Amendment that gets Media Whore Marc Randazza the most attention for his Special EGO Trip.


Posted Here by
Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger, 
otherwise known as the Unhinged Blogger, Crazy Crystal Cox, Mad Dog Blogger Crystal Cox,
oh and my Favorite "Enemy" of Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Blog. Fighting Copyright Trolls. Is there Pattern and History in Marc Randazza's Behavior? Marc Randazza is KNOWN to be "the Most Hypocritical Troll". I would have to AGREE. Marc Randazza is Working AGAINST Free Speech and the First Amendment in Obsidian V. Cox.

Why Did Marc Randazza really contact the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, BEFORE Marc Randazza let his potential client know that he was going to the Plaintiff's side and discussing my personal information, my strategy? Was Marc Randazza trying to see if he could WIN, before he was hired for or took the job as attorney for Crystal Cox Blogger? Was Marc Randazza trying to make a deal with the Plaintiff, behind the Pro Se Defendant's back in order to change "bad law" for his Porn Company Big Wigs, whom Marc Randazza told me called him and asked what he was going to do about the Crystal Cox Case?

Did Marc Randazza have a legal right to talk to Crystal Cox Blogger, me, and discuss being my attorney, yet not agree to such and then take my private information to the Plaintiff to cut a deal that did not involve me ?

The Plaintiff's Attorney in Obsidian Vs. Cox is not just any attorney, the Plaintiff's Attorney, David Aman and the Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Corruption that Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox has been exposing for over 3 years. Blogger Crystal Cox was getting information found in the search engines regarding the Summit Bankruptcy and the Objection to Fees that Named Tonkon Torp.  David Aman Knew This, as in the Stephanie DeYoung Deposition. So when Marc Randazza contacted Tonkon Torp, Marc Randazza was telling my information to the very guys whom I was exposing. Marc Randazza had no right, as far as I am concerned to discuss my business with the Plaintiff's side WITHOUT involving me in any way or letting me know what Marc Randazza was up to, allegedly on my behalf.

Marc Randazza don't Know that I Played Texas Hold Em' for 18 Years and Well I certainly have the BALLS to call his BLUFF. So seeings how I called his bluff demanding I give him Marc Randazza.com, now Marc Randazza is in bed with the DEVIL and affecting the First Amendment Rights of us ALL.

I am considering filing a Federal RICO Complaint Against Marc Randazza, as tonight I see there is Pattern and History in Marc Randazza's tactics.

Here is an Article from a Blog Called "Fight Copyright Trolls".

Title of Marc Randazza Article on Fight Copyright Trolls Blog
"Do you still think that talking to plaintiff’s lawyer is a good idea?"

"I’m never tired of repeating over and over again that talking to plaintiff’s attorney (a copyright troll) directly, not through your own lawyer, is not only a questionable idea, but just a plain stupid idea. Reading numerous comments on TorrentFreak, ArsTechnica, Techdirt and other discussion boards, I sometimes see someone bragging: “If I received a call from a troll, I would tell him…” Wrong! You don’t want to tell him anything. Just hang up. Ignore emails and scary ransom letters¹."

"TAC has pointed to a very-very sad story: a guy from one of the mass Liberty Media Holdings lawsuits received a call from an attorney notifying him that his IP address was recorded in connection with sharing a copyrighted material on BitTorrent, demanding money and asking questions. Instead of hanging up, this guy did the worst thing possible: he answered the questions and admitted that he downloaded that damned movie! He explained that he did not know that it was illegal, probably thinking that a reasonable copyright holder who cares about its business would say something like “ok, you are a good guy, and we appreciate the interest in our studio products, what you did was illegal, please stop doing that and here is the URL where you can buy and enjoy our products legally”.

Note, however, that here we are not talking about copyright holders who are interested in retaining fans and promoting their products. Instead, we are talking about scum of the Earth, disgraced attorneys who can’t think about anything but money right now with as little investment as possible. Ruining someone’s life for a $40 movie is something that these vampires wouldn’t hesitate to do if it could possibly bring them a couple of dollars."

"Marco Randazza, the most hypocritical troll as of today"

Source of Marc Randazza Post and Full Marc Randazza Article
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2011/10/14/do-you-still-think-that-talking-to-plaintiff%E2%80%99s-lawyer-is-a-good-idea/

Marc Randazza Quote
"“We did get a satisfactory payment from the prior defendant,” Randazza said. “And while we don’t expect to get $1.75 million from Mr. Brown, we do expect to extract something from him.”
http://www.fortiumtech.com/article.aspx?id=405

Proskauer Rose Guilty, Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud.. IViewit is Next. 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal, USPTO, DOJ, SEC, knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud.

Proskauer Rose Guilty, Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court

Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger

Crystal Cox Blogs
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Crystal L. Cox Blogger
Crystal Cox Whistleblower